Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

È­ÇÐÁßÇÕÇü ¹× ±¤ÁßÇÕÇü ·¹ÁøÁ¢ÂøÁ¦°¡ ±Ý¼Ó ¹× µµÀçºê¶óÄÏÀÇ Àü´Ü°áÇÕ°­µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

EFFECTS OF CHEMICALLY CURED RESIN AND LEGHT CURED RESIN ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF METAL BRACKET AND CERAMIC BRACKET

°æÈñÄ¡´ë³í¹®Áý 1993³â 15±Ç 1È£ p.147 ~ 156
À±´ö»ó, À̱â¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±´ö»ó (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Áö°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç
À̱â¼ö (  ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ Áö°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú±³Á¤Çб³½Ç

Abstract


This study was designed for comparison of shear bond strengths and failure patterns of four experimental groups which combinated mesh-backed metal brackets and texture based ceramic brackets (Transcend series 2000`T") with chemically cured resin (Mono Lok2`Tn¢¥") and visible light cured resin (TransbondrM)
Brackets were bonded on the extracted human bicuspids, after etching them by manufacturer¢¥s recom mand, and the shear bond strengths were measured on the Instron machine after 24 hrs passed in the 3¢¥7t water bath.
The results were as follows.
1. Ceramic brackets, transcend series 2000CTM¢¥, bonded with MonoLok2(TM¢¥ showed statistically higher shear bond strength than mesh-backed metal brackets bonded with MonoLok2(TM¢¥
2. There was no significant difference in shear bond strengths between metal and ceramic brackets bonded with Transbond`TM"
3. Ceramic brackets bonded with both TransbondTM¢¥ and MonoLok2`T"" showed primarily fractures between brackets adhesive interface.
4. Enamel crack was not found in anyone specimen.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸